BCM 215

Critical Self Reflection – Week 5 BP

I contributed specific, fairly detailed feedback on the delivery mode of, (predominantly), my peers’ videos and also their blogs, which I believe my peers would have found valuable and will hopefully enable them to make improvements in their future posts. 

I commented briefly on the understandability of the analytical frameworks and made a few recommendations for changes and inclusions based on the lecture notes, like improving Gantt Charts and Feedback Loops where necessary. I was remiss in that I provided no suggestions for further research, which I will remedy in future.

While giving feedback on my peers’ pitch videos, I learned the importance of assessing audio-visual information, in order to make recommendations for future improvements and to help promote their audiences’ understanding. 

I applied the criteria below to evaluate the visuals: 

  • Were the images on the screen relevant / complementary to the spoken information? Were they distracting? 
  • Were there too few images? Too many? 
  • Were there too many words on the screen? Too few?
  • Was the print style, colour and size readable?

Regarding the audio I considered:

  • Was the voice-over easy to understand? Spoken too fast or too slow?
  • Was the voice audible and expressive. Did it communicate interest? 
  • Did the voice have a comfortable listening pitch?

The success of the presentation’s delivery is based upon good planning too. I considered that the information should be complete and correct. This includes spelling, grammar and sentence structure. The video should also be clear, (understandable on the first viewing), and concise, (the information should be presented in the required timeframe with full meaning apparent).

I decided that I should be diplomatic and empathise with my fellow students when giving feedback. How would I want to be evaluated? I decided the best approach would be to praise their work before I gave any constructive criticism. 

When I was giving the actual criticism, I used my words and expressions diplomatically. I also signed off with a positive statement about looking forward to seeing more of their work in the future.

I think this ‘respect treatment’ in giving feedback, bodes well for its incorporation into any future work. My peers are less likely to feel insulted and thus rejecting of the comments. If they were insulted, I would have to listen to their feedback regarding this and re-evaluate/redesign my approach.

To be more engaging regarding feedback in the future, I also need to provide information on those areas that I neglected this time, like recommendations for further research.  

I learned from evaluating my peers’ work that the strength of my pitch video is its presentation regarding the use of audio-visual support materials. A critical look at my peers’ works also made me realise my pitch’s weakness is the brief treatment of any research and linkage to the lecture notes; and that my pitch’s analytical framework needs development and inclusion. 

I also learned from my peers that there are other platforms upon which to effectively communicate my pitch, such as PowerPoints or Prezi.

I hope they learned something valuable from me, as I certainly learned from them.

My comment to Georgie: https://georgieobriendotcom.wordpress.com/2021/08/20/nostalgia-in-video-games-bcm215-pitch/
My comments to Jessica: https://jessajenkinsblog.wordpress.com/2021/08/19/fishy-business/
My comments to Melissa: https://blogbymell.wordpress.com/2021/08/20/candy-crush-mums-da-pitch/

2 thoughts on “BCM 215

  1. Hi Adrian! I think this is a great idea! I like the way you have included a podcast in your pitch video, it allows the reader to see what you are going to produce. The way you have formatted your post is very clear and concise. Your video is also very eye catching with images that match what is being said. The sources you have linked seem to be very useful for your topic. The only note I have for you is to have a think about what your analytical frame is, and implement it for the beta. It will help you with your research process. Otherwise I think your pitch is very good and I am excited to see how your project goes.


  2. Hi! I was a little confused as to which post was your actual pitch, the use of categories or something on your blog might help your audience to navigate through your posts a little easier. I liked how creative and detailed your video was and how you are planning an inclusive DA Project. I also think it is incredibly relevant how you have included COVID-19 in your post and isolation. I do enjoy all the statistics that you have placed in your post although I think maybe you could have provided a visual image or something to show a detailed explanation of the timeline of your project. I’m excited to see this project develop!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create your website with WordPress.com
Get started
%d bloggers like this: